This is actually a shot from the film in question, but curiously enough is also the exact image I wanted to use of myself as a header. Consider it, then, a placeholder. |
Taking In The Trash (note: this is a clever clever pun.
Chortle) is a feature I plan on doing as often as possible on our to-be-weekly
podcast but on account of me watching more than one trashy film a week I’m
going to throw some of them on here as well. There shall be zero overlap in the
written and recorded word save for directional mentions from one to the other.
Guaranteed.
This entry’s not written as a recommendation though. I just
finished watching 1980’s confused shocker Cannibal Apocalypse and if I get this
article out of it, then it’ll feel like it was worth my while. Imagine for me,
though, an alternate world, an alternate September 7th 2012 where I
watched Cannibal Apocalypse and didn't write about it. In this nightmarish
pseudo-existence, where a man can watch a film and just not write about it,
there and only there would watching Cannibal Apocalypse have been a pointless
exercise.
Commences the inquisition. Is it a good film? No. Is it a
terrible film? Almost definitely yes.
Almost definitely?
Yeah. Just almost. Look, I’m getting to it guy, OK? If you
view this movie as a horror film (starring John Saxon off of Nightmare On Elm
Street and Enter The Dragon), it’s a bit of a failure. Scenariowise it presents
Saxon (my number one Bond That Never Was) as a Vietnam vet struggling with
nightmares about the time he rescued two of his captured men and was bitten by
one. The implication – and I’ve either imagined this or read it on the box – is
that the ‘Cong forced these cats to eat, I dunno, each other I guess, and they
developed a taste for it. It’s never really dealt with. Anyway, the film
presents these two guys, these prisoners, as suffering from PTSD and Saxon
living a subdued private hell at home with his wife and worryingly interested
teenie neighbour. After a long, long time spent setting up the whole, you know,
they-were-in-Vietnam-and-share-a-bond-and-have-ended-up-a-little-up-the-left
thing, these dudes start biting people who themselves start biting people and
you’re left with a horror film that’s no longer a considered study on the
effects of war but a parable about the effects of war. Side A of Cannibal
Apocalypse documents three men who came back emotionally and somewhat
physically scarred from their fruitless military venture. Side B suggests that
war turned them into actual monsters, completely ruined them and by extension
the lives of those they came into contact with.
It doesn’t wash. It’s too obvious, right, as obvious as a
cat offering you a sign that reads “look, I don’t like water, I’m even less
fond of dogs and milk? Yes to all the milk, ta”. Antonio Margheriti directs a
film that works best when it’s at its worst. Refresher O’Clock – you need to approach
Cannibal Apocalypse the wrong way to enjoy it, and you get the most from it
when it fools you into thinking it’s not a horror film for the first 45 minutes,
and the least when it becomes a horror film for the last 45 minutes at the
expense of some restrained social commentary. You buy it because it’s in the
horror section, dig? The first half of the movie is just the last ten minutes
of First Blood (which, in an unplanned coincidence, I watched right before it
and have fallen hard hard in love with all over again. YOU SHOULDN’T HAVE
PUSHED HIM TEASLE!) You think “sugar, this isn’t the zombiefest it was sold to
me as.” You settle in though, and even if you’re not coming off the back of
Rambers, the plight of young men who were shipped to another country and made
into figurative monsters should elicit sympathy, OK, you big bastard? And yeah, you come
to terms with it as a kinda subtle reflection on alla that with added non-bonus
teen pubage. Then it flips on you and becomes the horror film you were
originally sold and can no longer welcome. “Hi, awkward allegory. You’re late,
everyone’s left, the soup’s gone cold and yeah you can still eatdrink it but it
tastes like shit now and you kinda ruined the night. You can have the sofa if
you want to stay but I don’t want to see you here when I get home from work tomorrow.”
Neither of these kids are Saxon's, which is especially helpful when he bones one of them. Also though it's regrettable that that happens. Still, though, incest-free... |
Saxon sports a good line in turtlenecks, chinos and
lumberjack shirts throughout, though I was surprised to learn afterwards that
he claims to have never watched the film, supported it being banned and
generally regrets being involved. Seems he signed on without, um, maybe reading
it or something. I mean, how else does that happen? I can only presume the
title stems from the Apocalypse Now/ Vietnam connection. You wanna talk
exploitation, there’s exploitation. Not a single sign of apocalypse otherwise. Another writer contested that the film's six cannibals better merits the title 'Cannibal Inconvenience'.
Also I just read a little about the film there and it pretty
much confirmed for me that I may have had a little sleepy while it was on ‘cause
several things were not seen by me. Go fig.
In short – watch it as a horror film and it’s pointless.
Watch it as a film with something to say and it succeeds half in, half out and
is still a little pointless. Watch it and write about it and it's
dingdingdingdingding straight to the bank. At first we got a few laughs from it because of poor
editing, a completely unsuitable score and one shot in particular where four
drops of blood accompanied four plucks of a guitar, and the gore effects are
definitely enough to have earned the film’s place on the original UK list of
banned Video Nasties, but by the end of the film I was just willing it to end.
As a B to the A of First Blood is was a cool curio, but like I said, I’m not
recommending it. What I am recommending is The Living Dead At The Manchester
Morgue, part of the same Original Video Nasties label from Optimum and also the
subject of this week’s Pod entry for Taking In The Trash. I’ll see you again next
week. Suggestions for this sort of thing are welcome and encouraged, so comment
away and I’ll see ya soon. 'Til then... pleasant SCREAMS.
No comments:
Post a Comment